Skip to content

Agentic Covenants

Agentic Covenants Matrix

If the agent decides to violate this concern, what stops it at this layer?

Filter

All 18

Layers, by what they can actually enforce

  • In-agent: advisory

    System prompts, model training, tool descriptions, refusals. No homeostatic stake, no pre-action pause, no learning loop. Treat as nudge, not control.

  • Client-side hooks: deterministic-when-invoked

    Operator-machine or agent-execution context. Strong against language attacks. Weak against an agent with shell access and time.

  • Server-side enforcement: deterministic-and-external

    Runs on the target system, not on the agent. Bypass requires compromise, policy gaps, or operator manipulation.

Showing 3 of 18.

  • Content integrity at In-agent

    System-prompt hardening, instruction hierarchy, and provenance framing of untrusted content with a per-fetch nonce. Advisory, and weaker here than anywhere else in this matrix: prompt injection is an attack aimed precisely at this layer, so it is the one surface an adversary directly optimizes against. Reduces low-effort attacks so downstream scanners have less to score. Never cite it as a mitigation in a risk register.

  • Content integrity at Client-side hooks

    Input scanning before the model sees fetched content, output scanning before a response or tool argument leaves, tool-result sanitization stripping zero-width, bidi, tag-block and ANSI sequences plus the wrapping nonce. Probabilistic: these score and threshold, so false positives and false negatives are inherent. Never block on input scores, which is how a control gets switched off next quarter; block on output, where a false positive costs a retry and a false negative costs a secret.

  • Content integrity at Server-side enforcement

    Egress NetworkPolicy so exfiltration has nowhere to post, DLP at the boundary, and send-side audit written outside the agent's reach. Deliberately the weakest server-side cell in the framework: it catches the consequence, not the manipulation. The control that actually works is not a content control at all. A scoped credential, deny-by-default RBAC, and default-deny egress make a successful injection worthless, so injection is an authorization and blast-radius problem wearing a content costume.