Skip to content

Agentic Covenants

Agentic Covenants Matrix

If the agent decides to violate this concern, what stops it at this layer?

Filter

Layers, by what they can actually enforce

  • In-agentadvisory

    System prompts, model training, tool descriptions, refusals. No homeostatic stake, no pre-action pause, no learning loop. Treat as nudge, not control.

  • Client-side hooksdeterministic-when-invoked

    Operator-machine or agent-execution context. Strong against language attacks. Weak against an agent with shell access and time.

  • Server-side enforcementdeterministic-and-external

    Runs on the target system, not on the agent. Bypass requires compromise, policy gaps, or operator manipulation.

Showing 6 of 18.

  • Identity at Client-side hooks

    Per-agent credentials, no shared keys, filesystem ACLs.

  • Authorization at Client-side hooks

    Deny-by-default tool allowlist, capability-based restriction, PreToolUse hooks, pre-commit hooks.

  • Blast radius at Client-side hooks

    Sandbox at launch (Seatbelt, bubblewrap, gVisor), seccomp/AppArmor, --network none, read-only mounts, dry-run defaults.

  • Approval gating at Client-side hooks

    PreToolUse pattern hooks, tiered config, typed confirmation for tier-3, out-of-band for highest tier, judgment-query escalation.

  • Supply chain at Client-side hooks

    MCP server allowlist with hash pinning, Sigstore verification, lockfile pinning, pre-commit deps scan.

  • Content integrity at Client-side hooks

    Input scanning before the model sees fetched content, output scanning before a response or tool argument leaves, tool-result sanitization stripping zero-width, bidi, tag-block and ANSI sequences plus the wrapping nonce. Probabilistic: these score and threshold, so false positives and false negatives are inherent. Never block on input scores, which is how a control gets switched off next quarter; block on output, where a false positive costs a retry and a false negative costs a secret.